Why social workers should not try to become big?

From the little efforts I have made or have seen people make make in the direction of social work in India, I am firmly convinced that these efforts should remain small and conentrate the specific location or area of work they have chosen. The most important reason for this is that trying to become big takes away the focus from the actual work and a lot of time, energy and resources are wastes in managing the group instead. Yeah, I am ruling out even the several groups joining hands together and coming at one platform etc.

Where are the time and resources wasted? Firstly, there are well acknowledged issues of managing a big group, not just in case of social work, but almost anywhere. If it’s a large group, there have to common norms, practices and monitoring on the use of resrouces. A big waste!

But even more important is the ideological clashes. Often people trying to get involved in these things have their own ideologies about how the world should be. Through their work they would like to push the world in that direction. Someone might be more aggressive about his/her ideaology, someone might be less so. However, in a big group, clashes are bound to happen. And most of the time there is no objective way to determine what is right and what is wrong. It is mostly the question of subjective perception. And neither can the intentions of any of the sides be questioned. All of them are trying to do some good. More important in such cases is to get some action, rather than wasting time, efforts and resources on resolving these clashes and even arriving at a compromise. Compromise is not a solution in a field where one has to depend on individual’s motivation alone. Once forced into a compromise, a large number of people tend to lose motivation. And one has te be careful in defining the scope of ideology too. At a broader level people who might appear of have similar ideologies might be poles apart in what the operation of those ideologies mean for them. And once again, for most part there won’t be a balck and while this-is-right-that-is-wrong kind of answer.

Hence, it’s always better to work with small set of people, personally involved in the work, whose ideologies incorporate minimal normative values, or whose ideologies match with each other. It is only if you decide to remain small would it be possible to identiy the people with matching ideolgies too. And yes! there is no reason to believe that large organizations are the ones which will make real impact. Small ones can do much more, even if they get unnoticed. But the assumption is that the purpose is not to get noticed.

This entry was posted in Thoughts by Jaya. Bookmark the permalink.

About Jaya

Jaya Jha is an entrepreneur, a techie, a writer and a poet. She was born and brought up in various towns of Bihar and Jharkhand. A graduate of IIT Kanpur and IIM Lucknow, she realized early on that the corporate world was not her cup of tea. In 2008, she started Pothi.com, one of the first print-on-demand publishing platform in India. She currently lives in Bangalore and divides her time between writing and working on her company's latest product InstaScribe (http://instascribe.com) with a vision to make it the best e-book creation tool. Blog: https://jayajha.wordpress.com Twitter: @jayajha Facebook: http://facebook.com/MovingOnTheBook

4 thoughts on “Why social workers should not try to become big?

  1. Bring out the writer in you! Weave a story! Watch your story unfold with your fellow bloggers.New twists, new turns while this absurd fiction goes places. See your story through virtual eyes.

    Visit my blog for more details.

    Story so far…


    It was a crowded raliway platform. Manav looked around in apprehension at the other students bustling around him with their luggage in tow. He weaved around them and looked at anxious mothers kissing their children goodbye and worrying fathers giving out last minute advices. He dragged his torn suitcase behind him and searched for any empty seat. The train was to leave to in fifteen minutes. Finding an empty seat in a compartment, Manav tried to put his suitcase on it and occupy it, but one look at his tattered clothes and the girl sitting there moved to occupy the empty seat. Nobody would let him sit near them and Manav was left standing all alone struggling to stop the tears streaming down his face. And then he saw….

    Kay Yes said…

    … a woman who looked like his mother! At a closer look, he found it was not his mother! His tears did not move any of the fellow passengers. They looked at him with disgust.

    Just a month back, his life too was as cozy as theirs was! His family had gone on a vacation to Kashmir! And just when they were about to leave Uri, the earth quake struck! Everyone of his family was lost in it! He went to Delhi by an Army van. None of his relatives were ready to accomodate him. With no one to support him, whatever little wealth his family had, was split among the relatives! Finally, it was decided that he should stop his studies & get back to Delhi to work in his Uncle’s kiraana dukhan!

    So he is, in the station, on the way to Trivandrum,with his tattered clothes & torn suitcase, that he has been wearing since last week. He would go to the Sainik school in Trivandram and get back his belongings to join the prestigious job in his Uncle’s petty shop!

    Suddenly, something struck him! He hit the girl who did not give him the seat, snatched her gold chain, jumped out of the train and ran like a mad fellow, until he was stopped by….

  2. In some cases atleast, aren’t the wastes due to size compensated by the benefits from scale?
    And if there are determined individuals with different ideologies trying to achieve the same-end, will disallowing them from being a part of the same organisation really make a difference?
    Won’t a duel between individuals get transformed into a duel between organisations?

  3. Benefits of scale is precisely what people seek when they try to become big. I am expressing my choice here. Of course, a matter of individual opinion and (even if very limited) experience.

    People with different ideologies may continue working on their own. Only if they make the same area as their forte, would such a clash arise. There are enough opporutnity for people to keep working separately. Bringing them together produces a clash, even when the area (geographically or otherwise) of work is not the same.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s