On Chivalry
Posted by Jaya on January 4, 2006
http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-29_101
I absolutely do not have any comments to make on this piece. This says it all!!
Thanks to Apurva for sending the link.
Posted by Jaya on January 4, 2006
http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-29_101
I absolutely do not have any comments to make on this piece. This says it all!!
Thanks to Apurva for sending the link.
January 5, 2006 at 9:34 am
Categorization is not limited to only gender. We see categorization based on nationality, religion, caste, age, college, Hall (remember Hall-2 Hall-3) and what not. It’s a bit natural (innate?) way to deal with complex ideas. Okay, I would not go into the Psychology, I guess you know it as much as I know if not better.
What I want to point is that it would not be very fruitful to just start a revolution for equality based on Gender; we want a more wholesome equality.
PS: Please CC your comment on my mail too, I am not very frequent reader..
January 5, 2006 at 9:45 am
I can see that you are not a frequent reader; else a comment like this should not have come.
Hence, replynig to it would mean repeating myself to boredom. I will avoid that. Since this reply would not be of much value to you, I am not CCing it to your id either.
January 5, 2006 at 10:47 am
Abhas: I think even the article was saying the same thing and anyway, a journey of thousand miles, starts with a small step.
Jaya: Nice piece. It didn’t left me with a feeling of having been offended as most of such articles tend to do. But even chivalary has its advantages at times. What do you say?
January 5, 2006 at 11:57 am
Yeah? I would like to know what are the advantages
January 5, 2006 at 2:36 pm
But even chivalary has its advantages at times. What do you say?
Sure! It just depends on your sex.
January 6, 2006 at 9:42 pm
He he .. .nice one Apurva !