On Chivalry
Posted by Jaya on January 4, 2006
http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-29_101
I absolutely do not have any comments to make on this piece. This says it all!!
Thanks to Apurva for sending the link.
Timepass pollsPosted by Jaya on January 4, 2006
http://blog.shrub.com/archives/tekanji/2005-12-29_101
I absolutely do not have any comments to make on this piece. This says it all!!
Thanks to Apurva for sending the link.
January 5, 2006 at 9:34 am
Categorization is not limited to only gender. We see categorization based on nationality, religion, caste, age, college, Hall (remember Hall-2 Hall-3) and what not. It’s a bit natural (innate?) way to deal with complex ideas. Okay, I would not go into the Psychology, I guess you know it as much as I know if not better.
What I want to point is that it would not be very fruitful to just start a revolution for equality based on Gender; we want a more wholesome equality.
PS: Please CC your comment on my mail too, I am not very frequent reader..
January 5, 2006 at 9:45 am
I can see that you are not a frequent reader; else a comment like this should not have come.
Hence, replynig to it would mean repeating myself to boredom. I will avoid that. Since this reply would not be of much value to you, I am not CCing it to your id either.
January 5, 2006 at 10:47 am
Abhas: I think even the article was saying the same thing and anyway, a journey of thousand miles, starts with a small step.
Jaya: Nice piece. It didn’t left me with a feeling of having been offended as most of such articles tend to do. But even chivalary has its advantages at times. What do you say?
January 5, 2006 at 11:57 am
Yeah? I would like to know what are the advantages
January 5, 2006 at 2:36 pm
But even chivalary has its advantages at times. What do you say?
Sure! It just depends on your sex.
January 6, 2006 at 9:42 pm
He he .. .nice one Apurva !